Social Media as a Tool for Political Mobilization: A Case Study of the 2020 Hong Kong Protests
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55885/jprsp.v3i1.199Keywords:
Social Media, Political Mobilization, Hong Kong ProtestsAbstract
This paper aims at analyzing how social media approves activism but also weakens it at the same time. Through an analysis of social media posts, interviews with key stakeholders, and documentary evidence, the research explores four key themes: The latter include Decentralized Coordination, where Octavia Butler uses focalization to correlate Schmidt’s narrative control with the observation of the subjects; Surveillance and Censorship, where her Parables explore the capacities for global solidarity. The study shows that, although, platforms such as Telegram and Twitter played a crucial role on enabling decentralised coordination and influencing global narratives of protest, they also predisposed protestors to explicit threats that ranged from surveillance, censorship amongst others and disinformation campaigns. The paper shows how the process of political mobilisation through social media is not straightforward or slack, as it underlines the theoretical and practical issues that arise on that matter. This research fills the gap in knowledge and adds to the discussion regarding the applicability of technology, namely social media in the continuation of political activism in oppressive states.References
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739-768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. John Wiley & Sons.
Chadwick, A., & Howard, P. N. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190696726.001.0001
Deibert, R. J. (2019). The road to digital unfreedom: Three painful truths about social media. Journal of Democracy, 30(1), 25-39. 10.1353/jod.2019.0002
Earl, J., & Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the Internet age. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262015103.001.0001
Gerbaudo, P. (2016). Constructing public space| rousing the Facebook crowd: Digital enthusiasm and emotional contagion in the 2011 protests in Egypt and Spain. International Journal of Communication, 10, 20.
Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.
Howard, J., & Ruder, S. (2018). Universal language model fine-tuning for text classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.06146. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1801.06146
Karpf, D. (2020). Two provocations for the study of digital politics in time. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 17(2), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2019.1705222
Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Transnational advocacy networks in the movement society. The social movement society: Contentious politics for a new century, 221, 217-237.
Kim, Y., & Kim, D. (2021). Motivations and information sources for sharing fake news on social media during the COVID-19 pandemic. Telematics and Informatics, 60, 101620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101620
King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2017). How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review, 111(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305541600088X
Lin, S. S., Zhang, W., & Zheng, X. (2021). Social media use in the Hong Kong protests and counter-movements. In S. S. Lin, S. Shen, & R. Ling (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Chinese Media (pp. 463-476). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367464218-31
Lin, Y., Zhang, X., & Zheng, L. (2021). Networked mobilization in a protest campaign: The case of the 2019–2020 Hong Kong protests. International Journal of Communication, 15, 3238-3259. https://doi.org/10.47893/IJoC.3276
Lyons, I. M., Ansari, D., & Beilock, S. L. (2015). Qualitatively different coding of symbolic and nonsymbolic numbers in the human brain. Human brain mapping, 36(2), 475-488. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22641
MacKinnon, D. (2012). Beyond strategic coupling: reassessing the firm-region nexus in global production networks. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(1), 227-245. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbr009
Pasquale, S. J. (2015). Educational science meets simulation. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 29(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2015.02.003
Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2013). Social media and political communication: a social media analytics framework. Social network analysis and mining, 3, 1277-1291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-012-0079-3
Tandoc Jr, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “fake news”. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.
Wojcieszak, M., & Smith, A. (2020). Polarization, partisan selective sharing, and belief in fake news in the United States. Political Communication, 37(2), 222-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1638391
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications. Loss Angeles: Sage Publication
Zhang, X., Wen, D., Liang, J., Lei, J., & Howarth, C. (2021). Communication behaviors and psychological responses to COVID-19 news and information among Chinese college students: Cross-sectional survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(2), e23247. https://doi.org/10.2196/23247
Zubiaga, A., Aker, A., Bontcheva, K., Liakata, M., & Procter, R. (2018). Detection and resolution of rumours in social media: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 51(2), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3167918.
Zuboff, S. (2019, January). Surveillance capitalism and the challenge of collective action. In New labor forum (Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 10-29). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/1095796018819461
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Public Representative and Society Provision
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.