Analysis of the Interests of MA DDI Kalukunangka Students in Continuing Higher Education Studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55885/jerp.v3i2.263Keywords:
Education, Higher Education, Continuing StudyAbstract
Education lasts a lifetime, starting from birth. In the process of development, humans need education, through this process humans develop rapidly because the environment provides assistance in human development. The educational environment can be found at home, at school and in the community and the natural surroundings. Research method In general, the research method is defined as a scientific activity that is planned, structured, systematic, and has specific goals, both practical and theoretical. It is said to be a scientific activity because it is research with scientific and theoretical aspects. planned because research must be planned with due regard to time, funds and accessibility to places and data. The data source is the subject from which the research data was obtained. Based on the source, the data is divided into primary data which is the source of data obtained by the researcher from respondents through interviews with interviewees. Secondary data is data obtained by the researcher indirectly providing data to data collectors, for example through other people or documents. The research results show that students choose to deepen their knowledge and hone their skills by continuing their education to a higher level, in this case tertiary institutions. Thus they will be able to continue to be able to compete with the knowledge and skills they acquire when they have completed their studies from tertiary institutions. The factors that influence students' interest in continuing their studies to tertiary institutions are divided into 2, namely influencing factors and inhibiting factors as follows: influencing students' interest in continuing their studies to tertiary institutions (a) Internal factors include willingness, academic success (b) External factors include: Parents' socioeconomic status, Environment (family environment, community environment, school environment, school environment).References
Abutabenjeh, S., & Jaradat, R. (2018). Clarification of research design, research methods, and research methodology: A guide for public administration researchers and practitioners. Teaching Public Administration, 36(3), 237-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739418775787
Baltes, S., & Ralph, P. (2022). Sampling in software engineering research: A critical review and guidelines. Empirical Software Engineering, 27(4), 94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-021-10072-8
Balzer, W. K. (2020). Lean higher education: Increasing the value and performance of university processes. Productivity Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351216944
Barron, B., & Bell, P. (2015). Learning environments in and out of school. In Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 337-350). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315688244
Borgstede, M., & Scholz, M. (2021). Quantitative and qualitative approaches to generalization and replication–A representationalist view. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 605191. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.605191
Chamid A., & Rochmanudin. (2010). Graduated SMP/MTs. Yogyakarta: Paramitha Publishing.
Comings, J. P. (2023). Persistence: Helping adult education students reach their goals. In Review of Adult Learning and Literacy, Volume 7 (pp. 23-46). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003417996
Findler, F., Schönherr, N., Lozano, R., Reider, D., & Martinuzzi, A. (2019). The impacts of higher education institutions on sustainable development: A review and conceptualization. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(1), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-07-2017-0114
Gati, I., & Kulcsár, V. (2021). Making better career decisions: From challenges to opportunities. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 126, 103545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103545
Getz, D., & Page, S. J. (2019). Event studies: Theory, research and policy for planned events. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429023002
Hennink, M. M., Kaiser, B. N., & Weber, M. B. (2019). What influences saturation? Estimating sample sizes in focus group research. Qualitative health research, 29(10), 1483-1496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318821692
Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social science & medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
Hidi, S. E., & Renninger, K. A. (2019). Interest development and its relation to curiosity: Needed neuroscientific research. Educational Psychology Review, 31(4), 833-852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09491-3
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Brenner, B., Chopra, S. B., Davis, T., Talleyrand, R., & Suthakaran, V. (2001). The role of contextual supports and barriers in the choice of math/science educational options: A test of social cognitive hypotheses. Journal of counseling psychology, 48(4), 474. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0167.48.4.474
Li, T., Higgins, J. P., & Deeks, J. J. (2019). Collecting data. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, 109-141. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119536604.ch5
Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (2021). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In Aptitude, learning, and instruction (pp. 223-254). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003163244
Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. European journal of general practice, 24(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091
Mweshi, G. K., & Sakyi, K. (2020). Application of sampling methods for the research design. Archives of Business Review–Vol, 8(11), 180-193. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.811.9042
Nardi, P. M. (2018). Doing survey research: A guide to quantitative methods. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315172231
Peloquin, D., DiMaio, M., Bierer, B., & Barnes, M. (2020). Disruptive and avoidable: GDPR challenges to secondary research uses of data. European Journal of Human Genetics, 28(6), 697-705. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-020-0596-x
Rassel, G., Leland, S., Mohr, Z., & O'Sullivan, E. (2020). Research methods for public administrators. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429319860
Scott, J. T., Kilmer, R. P., Wang, C., Cook, J. R., & Haber, M. G. (2018). Natural environments near schools: Potential benefits for socio‐emotional and behavioral development in early childhood. American Journal of Community Psychology, 62(3-4), 419-432. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12272
Shin, D. D., & Kim, S. I. (2019). Homo curious: Curious or interested?. Educational Psychology Review, 31(4), 853-874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09497-x
Solarino, A. M., & Aguinis, H. (2021). Challenges and best‐practice recommendations for designing and conducting interviews with elite informants. Journal of Management Studies, 58(3), 649-672. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12620
Sovacool, B. K., Axsen, J., & Sorrell, S. (2018). Promoting novelty, rigor, and style in energy social science: Towards codes of practice for appropriate methods and research design. Energy research & social science, 45, 12-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.007
Stevenson, M., & Cole, R. (2018). Modern slavery in supply chains: a secondary data analysis of detection, remediation and disclosure. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 23(2), 81-99. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-11-2017-0382
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Education Review Provision
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Journal of Education Review Provision operates under articles of this journal licensed under a https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0. This allows for the reproduction of articles, free of submissions charge, with the appropriate citation information. All authors publishing with the Journal of Education Review Provision accept these as the terms of publication.