Regional Government's Role in Inclusive Deliberative Democracy for the Regent Election in Tolitoli Amid the Covid-19 Pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55885/jmap.v4i3.441Keywords:
Local Government, General Government Affairs, Deliberative DemocracyAbstract
The implementation of the election of the regent and deputy regent of Tolitoli Regency in the midst of a pandemic presents challenges that threaten security stability, disrupted information connectivity due to the pandemic invites risks that endanger the implementation of the election of the regent and deputy regent, as the main key to ensuring the democratic process runs according to plan, avoiding security disturbances, the regional government is considered important in carrying out its role in ensuring the deliberation process for inclusive participation in the election of the regent and deputy regent in the context of general government affairs, especially in fostering national insight and national resilience in order to strengthen the practice of Pancasila, the implementation of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the preservation of Bhinneka Tunggal Ika and the defense and maintenance of the integrity of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. This study aims to investigate the extent of the role and support of the district government in building deliberation for Inclusive participation in the implementation of the democratic process in Tolitoli Regency which took place amidst the pandemic, a deep understanding was obtained by tracing its commitment to the ideal aspects reflected in the fulfillment of the formal conditions of deliberative democracy which are reflected in the absence of an exclusive place for certain parties in a discussion participation on relevant themes, or the absence of restrictions in the form of prohibitions on discussing relevant information, this study shows a positive trend in government commitment, inclusive participation is answered as shown in the condition where all segments in society are part of every policy presented in the implementation of the regent election amidst the threat of a pandemic, which is the priority of deliberative democracy.References
Acuti, D., Glozer, S., & Crane, A. (2024). What is (and is not) stakeholder dialogue in CSR? A review and research agenda. In International Journal of Management Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12363
DeCanio, S. (2024). The Epistemology of Democracy and the Market: Rejoinder to Elliott. Critical Review, 36(1–2), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2024.2363028
Dewansyah, B. (2011). Deliberasi dalam Proses Demokrasi Elektoral: Praktik Forum Konstituen dalam Pilkada Kabupaten Bandung. Jurnal Konstitusi PSKN-FH Universitas Padjadjaran, 53(1).
Dodd, N., Habermas, J., & White, S. K. (1997). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. The British Journal of Sociology, 48(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/591763
Endo, C. (2024). Care, democracy and ‘being part of the story.’ Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2024.2397748
Fatmala, D. R., Amelia, A., & Trianingsih, F. A. (2020). Penggunaan Akun Bot Media Sosial untuk Mempengaruhi Opini Publik : Sebuah Tinjauan Hukum Di Indonesia. Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v4i1.2210
Fishkin, J. (2013). Democratic Practice: Filter vs. Mirror. New Perspectives Quarterly, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/npqu.11376
Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2009). Why Deliberative Democracy? In Why Deliberative Democracy? https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300287
Guzmán, V. S. (2024). Materiales Curriculares para una Enseñanza Deliberativa: Una revisión Cualitativa-Sistemática de las Características Clave que Fomentan el Aprendizaje de los Profesores. Praxis & Saber, 15(41 SE-Temática central), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.19053/uptc.22160159.v15.n41.2024.16665
Habermas, J. (2012). Reconciliation through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls’s Political Liberalism. In Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203723869-7
Handayani, E., & Sri Hardjanto, U. (2023). The Noken System as a Symbol of the Supreme Deliberation of Indigenous Peoples in Papua Anthropological Study of Law and Constitutional Law. Interdiciplinary Journal and Hummanity (INJURITY), 2(11). https://doi.org/10.58631/injurity.v2i11.137
Hendra Nurtjahjo. (2008). Filsafat Demokrasi. PT. Bumi Aksara.
Kroll, C. M., & Edinger-Schons, L. M. (2024). Corporate power and democracy: A business ethical reflection and research agenda. Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility, 33(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12608
Lindvall, D., & Karlsson, M. (2024). Exploring the democracy-climate nexus: a review of correlations between democracy and climate policy performance. In Climate Policy (Vol. 24, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2256697
Menoh, G. A. B. (2014). Religiusitas Bangsa sebagai Hasil Penalaran Agama-Agama di Indonesia: Diteropong dari Pespektif Filsafat Politik Jurgen Habermas. Jurnal Studi Agama Dan Masyarakat, 2(1).
Nurlia. (2019). Perlunya Revitalisasi Politik Demokratis melalui Musyawarah Dalam Konteks Budaya: Catatan tentang Pembangunan Partisipatif di Indonesia. Meraja Journal, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.33080/mrj.v2i3.75
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah. Kementerian Sekretariat Negara RI. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Rashid, S. H., & Fernandez, K. (2024). The evolving social media strategies of politicians in Malaysia: A critical review. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 20(1), 174–188. https://doi.org/10.17576/geo-2024-2001-11
Ronsumbre, N., & Sri K, D. (2020). Perwakilan Masyarakat Adat di Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Papua: Dinamuka dan Relevansi Pembentukan dengan Penguatan Demokrasi Deliberatif. Jurnal Moderat, 6(2).
Samson, L. L., Lokwang Ekitela, A., & Ndefru, J. (2024). Implications of Public Participation in Promoting Democratic Accountability in Budgeting Process a Systematic Review of Existing Literature and Future Research Directions. International Journal of All Research Education and Scientific Methods (IJARESM), 12(5), 2455–6211. www.ijaresm.com
Schieferdecker, D., Reinhardt, S., Mijs, J., Silva, G. M., Teeger, C., Carvalhaes, F., & Seekings, J. (2024). Everyday Conversations About Economic Inequality: A Research Agenda. Sociology Compass, 18(9). https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.70001
Schramme, T. (2024). Capable deliberators: towards inclusion of minority minds in discourse practices. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 27(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2021.2020550
Verhasselt, L. (2024). Towards Multilingual Deliberative Democracy: Navigating Challenges and Opportunities. Representation, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2024.2317781
von Malmborg, F. (2024). Strategies and Impacts of Policy Entrepreneurs: Ideology, Democracy, and the Quest for a Just Transition to Climate Neutrality. Sustainability, 16(12), 5272. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125272
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Management and Administration Provision
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Licensing Statement
Journal of Management and Administration Provision operates under articles of this journal licensed under a https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0. This allows for the reproduction of articles, free of submissions charge, with the appropriate citation information. All authors publishing with the Journal of Management and Administration Provision accept these as the terms of publication.
