Participatory Governance Practices in Incubators in Growing and Developing UMKM in Makassar City

Nurul Anniza; Hasniati Hasniati; Badu  Ahmad; Syahribulan Syahribulan

doi:10.55885/jmap.v4i1.670

Authors

Nurul Anniza Doctoral Program of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia
Hasniati Doctoral Program of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia
Badu Ahmad Doctoral Program of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia
Syahribulan Doctoral Program of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55885/jmap.v4i1.670

Keywords:

Inclusive Governance, Participatory Governance, Community Participation

Abstract

Participatory governance practices in the Makassar City MSME incubator involve various parties to support the development of micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs). The Makassar City Cooperative and MSME Service maximizes the role of incubators to assist 3,000 MSMEs, including through training and mentoring in financial management, digital marketing, and improving product quality. The purpose of the Inclusive Governance Research on the MSME Incubator program at the Makassar City Cooperative and MSME Service is to describe and analyze participatory governance practices in the Incubators in growing and developing MSMEs in Makassar City. This study uses a descriptive qualitative research method, with data collection techniques through observation, interviews, and documentation. The results of this study are Participatory Governance Practices on Inclusive Governance at the Makassar City Incubator Center show that community participation in the Makassar City incubator center program is not optimal. Although there are many benefits felt by the community in terms of improving business quality, income, consumers and business relations, participation in following all stages of the incubation process is still lacking. Based on data from the Cooperatives and SMEs Service, there are 2,162 MSMEs that entered the pre-incubation stage. However, after the classification curation was carried out, only 510 MSMEs passed the incubation stage, and only 113 reached the acceleration stage.

References

Ahmad, I., & Islam, M. R. (2024). Empowerment and participation: Key strategies for inclusive development. In Building strong communities: Ethical approaches to inclusive development (pp. 47-68). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83549-174-420241003

Bajwa, S., Dabral, A., Chatterjee, R., & Shaw, R. (2021). Co-producing knowledge innovation through thematic incubators for disaster risk reduction and sustainable development in India. Sustainability, 13(4), 2044. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042044

Bouncken, R. B., Qiu, Y., & García, F. J. S. (2021). Flexible pattern matching approach: Suggestions for augmenting theory evolvement. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, 120685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120685

Ciasullo, M. V., Troisi, O., Grimaldi, M., & Leone, D. (2020). Multi-level governance for sustainable innovation in smart communities: an ecosystems approach. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(4), 1167-1195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00641-6

De Jong, E., & Vijge, M. J. (2021). From Millennium to Sustainable Development Goals: Evolving discourses and their reflection in policy coherence for development. Earth System Governance, 7, 100087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2020.100087

Gallardo-Vázquez, D., & Lizcano-Álvarez, J. L. (2020). CSR-related competitiveness and legitimacy in MSMEs. Economics & Sociology, 13(1), 52-73. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2020/13-1/4

Gil-Garcia, J. R., Gasco-Hernandez, M., & Pardo, T. A. (2020). Beyond transparency, participation, and collaboration? A reflection on the dimensions of open government. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(3), 483-502. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2020.1734726

Gupta, J., & Vegelin, C. (2016). Sustainable development goals and inclusive development. International environmental agreements: Politics, law and economics, 16(3), 433-448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-016-9323-z

Houssou, U., Schulz, K. P., Biga-Diambeidou, M., & Abihona, S. (2024). University incubators and entrepreneurial universities: a case study of the process of setting up a university incubator in a developing country. International Journal of Technology Management, 95(3-4), 434-455. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2024.138802

Jatmiko, B., Udin, U. D. I. N., Raharti, R., Laras, T., & Ardhi, K. F. (2021). Strategies for MSMEs to achieve sustainable competitive advantage: The SWOT analysis method. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(3), 505-515. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no3.0505

Karadimitriou, N., Magnani, G., Timmerman, R., Marshall, S., & Hudson-Smith, A. (2022). Designing an incubator of public spaces platform: Applying cybernetic principles to the co-creation of spaces. Land Use Policy, 119, 106187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106187

Lal, T. (2021). Impact of financial inclusion on economic development of marginalized communities through the mediation of social and economic empowerment. International Journal of Social Economics, 48(12), 1768-1793. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-12-2020-0830

Ngepah, N. (2017). A review of theories and evidence of inclusive growth: an economic perspective for Africa. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 24, 52-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.008

Prasetyo, H. D. (2023). Strategy For Increasing the Competitiveness Of Sme In The Era Of Society 5.0. Journal Of Management, Accounting, General Finance and International Economic Issues (MARGINAL), 2(4), 958-965.

Rijal, S. (2023). The importance of community involvement in public management planning and decision-making processes. Journal of Contemporary Administration and Management (ADMAN), 1(2), 84-92. https://doi.org/10.61100/adman.v1i2.27

Rodriguez, M. Y., & Storer, H. (2020). A computational social science perspective on qualitative data exploration: Using topic models for the descriptive analysis of social media data. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 38(1), 54-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2019.1616350

Roseland, M. (2000). Sustainable community development: integrating environmental, economic, and social objectives. Progress in planning, 54(2), 73-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-9006(00)00003-9

Sanders, C. K., & Scanlon, E. (2021). The digital divide is a human rights issue: Advancing social inclusion through social work advocacy. Journal of human rights and social work, 6(2), 130-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-020-00147-9

Scheyvens, R., & Biddulph, R. (2018). Inclusive tourism development. Tourism Geographies, 20(4), 589-609. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2017.1381985

Tracy, S. J. (2024). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

Uddin, M. S., Haque, C. E., & Khan, M. N. (2021). Good governance and local level policy implementation for disaster-risk-reduction: Actual, perceptual and contested perspectives in coastal communities in Bangladesh. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 30(2), 94-111. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-03-2020-0069

Yuningsih, E., Harini, S., & Silaningsih, E. (2022). Strategy for improving MSMEs performance through stakeholder involvement. Indonesian Journal of Business Analytics, 2(1), 25-40.

Zeithaml, V. A., Jaworski, B. J., Kohli, A. K., Tuli, K. R., Ulaga, W., & Zaltman, G. (2020). A theories-in-use approach to building marketing theory. Journal of Marketing, 84(1), 32-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919888477.