Implementation of the Government Performance Accountability System (SAKIP) at Makassar Port Authority

Authors

  • Darmawati Program Magister Manajemen, Fakultas Pasca Sarjana Universitas Fajar Makassar, Indonesia
  • Mujahid Program Magister Manajemen, Fakultas Pasca Sarjana Universitas Fajar Makassar, Indonesia
  • Abdul Samad Program Magister Manajemen, Fakultas Pasca Sarjana Universitas Fajar Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55885/jmap.v5i3.722

Keywords:

SAKIP, Port Authority, Leadership

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of the Government Performance Accountability System (SAKIP) at the Makassar Port Authority, focusing on how it enhances institutional accountability and the challenges encountered during its execution. The research employs a qualitative design involving in-depth interviews, document analysis, and direct observation with key informants from various divisions of the Makassar Port Authority. Data were analyzed to identify patterns, supporting factors, and obstacles influencing the effectiveness of SAKIP implementation. The findings indicate that SAKIP has contributed to greater transparency, improved performance reporting, and more efficient budget utilization within the institution. Strong leadership commitment and coordination between divisions have enabled the system to operate effectively, resulting in several performance awards from the Ministry of Transportation and the Ministry of Finance. Nevertheless, challenges remain, including a shortage of human resources skilled in SAKIP, limited budget allocations, and weak integration of data management systems. These factors hinder optimal performance evaluation and timely reporting. The study concludes that successful implementation of SAKIP depends on continuous human resource development, the availability of adequate technological support, and active supervision by internal control units. The findings offer important implications for strengthening public sector accountability in Indonesia by integrating capacity building, digital governance, and performance-based evaluation. The study contributes to the growing body of literature on public accountability and provides a practical framework for enhancing governance quality across government agencies.

References

Afifah, A. N., Dirgantari, N., Pratama, B. C., & Wibowo, H. (2022). Sakip-Based Public Accountability for Local Governments in Central Java Province. International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 6(4), 1802-1820. https://doi.org/10.29040/ijebar.v6i4.6947

Aly, S. H., Pangemanan, S., Ningrat, A., Adisasmita, S. A., & Hustim, M. (2025). Strategizing Green Ports for a Sustainable Maritime Future: The Case Study of Makassar Port. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 15(3), 22334-22341. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.10392

Boivin, A., Lehoux, P., Burgers, J., & Grol, R. (2014). What are the key ingredients for effective public involvement in health care improvement and policy decisions? A randomized trial process evaluation. The Milbank Quarterly, 92(2), 319-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12060

Brewer, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2013). Personnel constraints in public organizations: The impact of reward and punishment on organizational performance. Public administration review, 73(1), 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02681.x

Calland, R., & Bentley, K. (2013). The impact and effectiveness of transparency and accountability initiatives: Freedom of information. Development policy review, 31, s69-s87. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12020

Eprianto, I. (2023). Literature Review: Factors Affecting The Performance Accountability Report of Government Agencies (LAKIP) Local Government in Indonesia. Accounting and Finance Studies, 3(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.47153/afs31.5312023

Han, Y. (2020). The impact of accountability deficit on agency performance: Performance-accountability regime. Public Management Review, 22(6), 927-948. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1679237

Hawalya, N., Remmang, H., & Faridah, F. (2025). Pengaruh Kejelasan Sasaran Anggaran Dan Sistem Pelaporan Terhadap Akuntanbilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Maros. ACCESS: Journal of Accounting, Finance and Sharia Accounting, 3(1), 31-37. https://doi.org/10.56326/access.v3i1.5532

Jipa, E. S., & Kusumastuti, R. (2024). The Influence Of Budgetary Planning, Budget Clarity, Reporting Structures, An D Internal Control Systems In Performance Accountability. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 2(8), 1058-1075.

Kealesitse, B., O'Mahony, B., Lloyd-Walker, B., & Jay Polonsky, M. (2013). Developing customer-focused public sector reward schemes: Evidence from the Botswana government's performance-based reward system (PBRS). International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(1), 33-55. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551311293426

Kosajan, V., Chang, M., Xiong, X., Feng, Y., & Wang, S. (2018). The design and application of a government environmental information disclosure index in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 202, 1192-1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.056

Kravchuk, R. S., & Schack, R. W. (1996). Designing effective performance-measurement systems under the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993. Public administration review, 348-358. https://doi.org/10.2307/976376

McGill, R. (2001). Performance budgeting. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 14(5), 376-390. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550110404633

Melitski, J., & Manoharan, A. (2014). Performance measurement, accountability, and transparency of budgets and financial reports. Public Administration Quarterly, 38-70.

Mujennah, M., Artinah, B., & Safriansyah, S. (2019). The effect of performance based budgeting and internal control systems on performance accountability of government agencies: a case study in Banjarbaru city inspectorates. Journal of Economic Info, 6(3), 7-15.

Pebrianti, S., & Aziza, N. (2019, January). Effect of clarity of budget objectives, accounting control, reporting systems, compliance with regulation on performance accountability of government agencies. In 1st Aceh Global Conference (AGC 2018) (pp. 396-410). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/agc-18.2019.62

Pedersen, J. F., Egilstrød, B., Overgaard, C., & Petersen, K. S. (2022). Public involvement in the planning, development and implementation of community health services: A scoping review of public involvement methods. Health & Social Care in the Community, 30(3), 809-835. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13528

Pratama, M. A. A. P., Rafdi, H., & Patty, A. N. (2024). Akuntabilitas Kinerja Inspektorat Kabupaten Lampung Tengah Dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance (Studi Laporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintahan 2023). Jurnal Ilmu Politik dan Studi Sosial Terapan, 3(4), 40-49.

Putra, G. H. (2025). Analysis of the Impact of the Implementation of Government Accounting Standards and the Use of Budget on the Performance Accountability of Government Institutions. Journal of Applied Science and Engineering Management Research, 1(1), 19-28.

Suartika, I. M., Maryudi, A., Djunaedi, A., & Darwin, M. M. (2024). Reviewing regulations and stakeholder perceptions of ride-sharing technical requirements in Indonesia. Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 3(2), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.55324/iss.v3i2.635

Suhana, I., Bogar, W., & Mandagi, M. (2023). The Role of Civil Servant Investigators (PPNS) in Implementing Regulation of the Director General of Sea Transportation No: Kp. 222/Djpl/2019 in Supporting the Main Duties and Functions of Class II Bitung Sea and Coast Guard Bases for Enforcement of Law No. 17 of 2008 Concerning Shipping. Technium Soc. Sci. J., 44, 53.

Telabah, I. W. S., Hermanto, H., & Handajani, L. (2018). Implementation of Performance Accountability System For Government Institution (SAKIP): Determinants and Consequence In Local Government. International Business and Accounting Research Journal, 2(2), 87-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/ibarj.v2i2.36

Wardani, E. K., & Hasibuan, D. (2024). The Impact of Financial Report Quality and Performance-Based Budget Implementation on the Accountability Performance of Government Agencies with Accounting Control as a Moderator: Empirical Study of Regional Government Work Units in Bogor City. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Kesatuan, 12(4), 471-482.

Zaghena, P., Mamentu, M., & Mingkid, E. (2022). Kinerja Dinas Pariwisata Dalam Penyusunan Laporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (LAKIP) Kabupaten Minahasa Selatan. Agri-Sosioekonomi, 18(3), 927-938. https://doi.org/10.35791/agrsosek.v18i3.45051

Zainal, A., Farza, T. C. N., Putra, P. D., Harahap, K., & Welly, Y. (2023). Government Governance, Government Quality, Transportation Infrastructure, and the Economic Growth: Evidence from Indonesia. Jurnal Samudra Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 14(1), 113-128. https://doi.org/10.33059/jseb.v14i1.5701

Zhang, L., Mol, A. P., He, G., & Lu, Y. (2010). An implementation assessment of China's environmental information disclosure decree. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 22(10), 1649-1656. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(09)60302-8

Downloads

Published

2025-11-28

How to Cite

Darmawati, D., Mujahid, M., & Samad, A. . (2025). Implementation of the Government Performance Accountability System (SAKIP) at Makassar Port Authority. Journal of Management and Administration Provision , 5(3), 585-599. https://doi.org/10.55885/jmap.v5i3.722