The Effectiveness of Environmental Policy in Addressing Climate Change

Authors

  • Sái Quỳnh Dao Business & Social Sciences, University of Hai Duong, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55885/jprsp.v3i1.189

Keywords:

Effectiveness, Environmental Policy, Climate Change

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyse the efficiency of environmental policies in mitigating climate change and the part played by stakeholders, political stability, policy research and policy fairness. In this research, quantitative to complement quantitative method has used to establish that where policies are made through public consultation, the policies will be effective in achieving its set objectives. It also focuses on the aspect of political stability and leadership on the ability to enhance policies ‘implementation and enforcement. In addition, data driven policies aligned with current and contextualized scientific knowledge to tackle environmental issues were determined to be more efficient. Last of all, the research also proves that ANT’s policies are more sustainable in the long run and those that strive at enhancing social equity and environmental justice are vital for achieving other environmental objectives. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that the combination of these factors in environmental policymaking is essential to fight climate change and support sustainable development.

References

Ahmed, M., Zehou, S., Raza, S. A., Qureshi, M. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2020). Impact of CSR and environmental triggers on employee green behavior: The mediating effect of employee well‐being. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(5), 2225-2239. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1960

Ayers, J. (2010). Understanding the adaptation paradox: can global climate change adaptation policy be locally inclusive? (Doctoral dissertation, London School of Economics and Political Science).

Blühdorn, I., & Deflorian, M. (2019). The collaborative management of sustained unsustainability: On the performance of participatory forms of environmental governance. Sustainability, 11(4), 1189. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041189

Bozeman, B., & Sarewitz, D. (2011). Public value mapping and science policy evaluation. Minerva, 49, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-011-9161-7

Cheval, S., Adamescu, C. M., Georgiadis, T., Herrnegger, M., Piticar, A., & Legates, D. R. (2020). Observed and potential impacts of the covid-19 pandemic on the environment. In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(11). pp. 1–25). MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17114140

Ciplet, D. (2021). From energy privilege to energy justice: A framework for embedded sustainable development. Energy Research & Social Science, 75, 101996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.101996

Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S., & Giri, R. A. (2021). Mixed-methods research: A discussion on its types, challenges, and criticisms. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2(2), 25-36. https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v2i2.20

Dechezleprêtre, A., Fabre, A., Kruse, T., Planterose, B., Chico, A. S., & Stantcheva, S. (2022). Fighting climate change: International attitudes toward climate policies (No. w30265). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w30265

Fekete, H., Kuramochi, T., Roelfsema, M., den Elzen, M., Forsell, N., Höhne, N., ... & Gusti, M. (2021). A review of successful climate change mitigation policies in major emitting economies and the potential of global replication. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 137, 110602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110602

Gash, A. (2022). Collaborative governance. In Handbook on theories of governance (pp. 497-509). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800371972.00053

Goodman, S. W. (2012). Fortifying citizenship: Policy strategies for civic integration in Western Europe. World Politics, 64(4), 659-698. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887112000184

Jeong, H. C., & So, W. Y. (2020). Difficulties of online physical education classes in middle and high school and an efficient operation plan to address them. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(19), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197279

Knill, C., Debus, M., & Heichel, S. (2010). Do parties matter in internationalised policy areas? The impact of political parties on environmental policy outputs in 18 OECD countries, 1970–2000. European journal of political research, 49(3), 301-336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01903.x

Lagouvardou, S., Psaraftis, H. N., & Zis, T. (2020a). A literature survey on market-based measures for the decarbonization of shipping. In Sustainability (Switzerland) 12(10). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12103953

Lagouvardou, S., Psaraftis, H. N., & Zis, T. (2020b). A literature survey on market-based measures for the decarbonization of shipping. In Sustainability (Switzerland) 12(10). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12103953

Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy sciences, 45(2), 123-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-012-9151-0

Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global environmental change, 17(3-4), 445-459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004

Malhi, G. S., Kaur, M., & Kaushik, P. (2021). Impact of climate change on agriculture and its mitigation strategies: A review. In Sustainability (Switzerland) 13(3). pp. 1–21. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031318

Nelson, D. R., Adger, W. N., & Brown, K. (2007). Adaptation to environmental change: contributions of a resilience framework. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 32(1), 395-419. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.32.051807.090348

Newig, J., Challies, E., Jager, N. W., Kochskaemper, E., & Adzersen, A. (2018). The environmental performance of participatory and collaborative governance: A framework of causal mechanisms. Policy Studies Journal, 46(2), 269-297. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12209

Niemeier, D., Beamish, T. D., Kendall, A., Grattet, R., London, J., de la Pena, C., & Sze, J. (2016). Characterizing the Impacts of Uncertainty in the Policy Process: Climate Science, Policy Construction, and Local Governance Decisions. In Transition towards Sustainable Mobility (pp. 119-136). Routledge.

Peters, B. G., Capano, G., Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I., Chou, M. H., & Ravinet, P. (2018). Designing for policy effectiveness: Defining and understanding a concept. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108555081

Pichon, M., Treves-Kagan, S., Stern, E., Kyegombe, N., Stöckl, H., & Buller, A. M. (2020). A mixed-methods systematic review: Infidelity, romantic jealousy and intimate partner violence against women. In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, (16). 1–35. MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165682

Sima, V., Gheorghe, I. G., Subić, J., & Nancu, D. (2020). Influences of the industry 4.0 revolution on the human capital development and consumer behavior: A systematic review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12104035

Siregar, I. (2021). CSR-based corporate environmental policy implementation. British Journal of Environmental Studies, 1(1), 51-57. https://doi.org/10.32996/bjes.2021.1.1.6

Weible, C. M., Nohrstedt, D., Cairney, P., Carter, D. P., Crow, D. A., Durnová, A. P., ... & Stone, D. (2020). COVID-19 and the policy sciences: initial reactions and perspectives. Policy sciences, 53, 225-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09381-4

Downloads

Published

2023-05-03

How to Cite

Dao, S. Q. (2023). The Effectiveness of Environmental Policy in Addressing Climate Change. Journal of Public Representative and Society Provision, 3(1), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.55885/jprsp.v3i1.189