Inhibiting Factors of the Performance of Internal Government Supervisory Apparatus in Realizing Good Governance at the Regional Inspectorate of Mandailing Natal Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55885/jprsp.v5i1.470Keywords:
Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP), Good Governance, Regional Inspectorate, Performance Inhibiting Factors, Mandailing Natal RegencyAbstract
This study aims to analyze the inhibiting factors of the performance of the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP) in realizing the principles of good governance in the Mandailing Natal Regency Inspectorate. Good governance is one of the main pillars in creating a transparent, accountable, and responsive government to the needs of the community. However, its implementation often faces various obstacles that affect the performance of APIP as an internal supervisor. This research method uses a qualitative approach with data collection techniques through in-depth interviews, observations, and document studies. The results of the study indicate that there are several main inhibiting factors, including: limited competent human resources, lack of budget support, weak independence of APIP in carrying out its duties, and resistance from the supervised organization. In addition, the low utilization of information technology in the supervision process is also a significant obstacle. This study concludes that to improve APIP performance in realizing good governance, it is necessary to strengthen human resource capacity through training, increase budget allocation, guarantee APIP independence, and optimize information technology. Strategic recommendations from this study are expected to be a reference for local governments in improving the internal supervision system in order to achieve better governance.References
Akbar, R., Pilcher, R. A., & Perrin, B. (2015). Implementing performance measurement systems. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 12(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-03-2013-0013
DeNisi, A., & Smith, C. E. (2014). Performance Appraisal, Performance Management, and Firm-Level Performance: A Review, a Proposed Model, and New Directions for Future Research. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 127–179. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.873178
Ferreira, A., & Otley, D. (2009). The design and use of performance management systems: An extended framework for analysis. Management Accounting Research, 20(4), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2009.07.003
Grindle, M. S. (2004). Good Enough Governance: Poverty Reduction and Reform in Developing Countries. Governance, 17(4), 525–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00256.x
Hasudungan, A. N., Ofianto, & Ningsih, T. Z. (2022). Learning Loss: A Real Threat in Education for Underprivileged Students and Remote Regions during the Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Distance Education and E-Learning, 7(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.36261/ijdeel.v7i1.2223
Irianto, B. S. (2023). Regional Government Problematics. Equalegum International Law Journal, 1(3), 148–154. https://doi.org/10.61543/equ.v1i3.28
Juita, Y. (2023). The influence of the application of government accounting standards and local government internal control on the quality of financial reporting information. Indonesia Accounting Research Journal, 10(4), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.35335/iacrj.v10i4.151
Kadarisman, M. (2019). The influence of compensation, development, and supervision towards the performance of civil servants in depok city government, Indonesia. Cogent Psychology, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2019.1620402
Kamaludin, K., & Usman, B. (2018). Policy regime and policy change: Comparing the phenomenon of local government before and after regional autonomy. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 21(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v21i1.940
Larsson, S. (2009). A pluralist view of generalization in qualitative research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437270902759931
Levitt, H. M. (2021). Qualitative generalization, not to the population but to the phenomenon: Reconceptualizing variation in qualitative research. Qualitative Psychology, 8(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000184
Manik, F., Rengifurwarin, R., & Madubun, M. (2024). The Role of Technology in Internal Oversight of Public Administration: Improving Efficiency and Transparency. MSJ : Majority Science Journal, 2(4), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.61942/msj.v2i4.248
McNulty, T., Zattoni, A., & Douglas, T. (2013). Developing Corporate Governance Research through Qualitative Methods: A Review of Previous Studies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12006
Moonti, R. M. (2019). Regional Autonomy in Realizing Good Governance. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 2(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.33096/substantivejustice.v2i1.31
Mustaufiq, M., Sultan, L., Ridwan, M. S., & Hasan, H. (2024). The Supervision Of The Internal Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (Apip) On The Abuse Of Authority In Governmental Positions In Jeneponto Regency. ANAYASA : Journal of Legal Studies, 2(1), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.61397/ays.v2i1.192
Natow, R. S. (2020). The use of triangulation in qualitative studies employing elite interviews. Qualitative Research, 20(2), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119830077
Nopirina, N. (2023). Urgent APIP in the Implementation of Bureaucracy Innovation to Establish quality of Maintenance Free of Corruption, Collusion, and Nepotism. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 10(9), 25. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v10i9.5045
Nugroho, A. A., Rahayu, N. S., & Yusuf, R. R. (2023). The Role of e-Government to Improve the Implementation of Merit System in Indonesian Local Goverments. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i11.13570
Pearson, M., & Brew, A. (2002). Research Training and Supervision Development. Studies in Higher Education, 27(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070220119986c
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2010). Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: Myths and strategies. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(11), 1451–1458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.004
Prawirosentono, S. (1999). Manajemen sumber Daya Manusia ( Kebijakan Kinerja Karyawan), Kiat membangun Organisasi Kompetitif menjelang Perdagangan Bebas Dunia (1st ed.). BPFE.
Rahmat, A. N., Ariesmansyah, A., & Andariah, T. (2024). Principles of Good Governance: Operational Management Direct Expenditure and Tax Services in General Affairs Division Secretariat of Local People’s Representative Council (DPRD) West Java Province, Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific Multidisciplinary Research, 2(10), 1345–1352. https://doi.org/10.55927/ijsmr.v2i10.11770
Rahmawati, R., Ibrahim, I., Irma, I., Bunyamin, B., & Dahlan, A. (2024). Budget Planning and Internal Control on Local Financial Accountability: Mediating Budget Absorption. Atestasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 7(1), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.57178/atestasi.v7i1.755
Saeed, G., Kohler, J. C., Cuomo, R. E., & Mackey, T. K. (2022). A systematic review of digital technology and innovation and its potential to address anti-corruption, transparency, and accountability in the pharmaceutical supply chain. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety, 21(8), 1061–1088. https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2022.2091543
Santos, K. da S., Ribeiro, M. C., Queiroga, D. E. U. de, Silva, I. A. P. da, & Ferreira, S. M. S. (2020). O uso de triangulação múltipla como estratégia de validação em um estudo qualitativo. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 25(2), 655–664. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020252.12302018
Syahuri, T., Saleh, G., & Abrilianti, M. (2022). The role of the corruption eradication commission supervisory board within the indonesian constitutional structure. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2035913
Widiastuti, T., Cahyono, E. F., Zulaikha, S., Mawardi, I., & Al Mustofa, M. U. (2021). Optimizing zakat governance in East Java using analytical network process (ANP): the role of zakat technology (ZakaTech). Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 12(3), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-09-2020-0307
Yurniwati, & Rizaldi, A. (2015). Control Environment Analysis at Government Internal Control System: Indonesia Case. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 844–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.111
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Public Representative and Society Provision

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.