Limitation of Fuel Subsidy in Healthizing State Revenue and Expenditure Budget
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55885/jprsp.v5i1.473Keywords:
Fuel Subsidy, Healthizing State Revenue, Expenditure BudgetAbstract
Fuel oil (BBM) subsidy policy in Indonesia has been an important element in economic policy since the era of President Soeharto's administration. Initially, this subsidy was aimed at maintaining energy price stability and protecting people's purchasing power, especially low-income groups. However, over time, fuel subsidies have created various economic and environmental problems, including a large burden on the State Revenue and Expenditure Budget (APBN), economic distortions, and obstacles to the renewable energy transition. This research uses a normative legal approach to analyze fuel subsidy policies within the framework of the welfare state in Indonesia, with the aim of formulating more effective regulations. The data used is primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials which are analyzed descriptively-analytically. The research results show that the fuel subsidy policy has not been effective and efficient, with most of the benefits being enjoyed by the middle and upper income groups, while those who should benefit, namely the poor, are left behind. Therefore, it is necessary to reformulate fuel subsidy policies with the principles of social justice, economic sustainability, transparency and accountability. Formulating more targeted policies, developing renewable energy, and implementing the principles of good governance will strengthen the welfare state and support more equitable and sustainable development.References
Apriantoro, M. S., Sabila, R. F., & Rosyadhi, R. I. (2022). Islamic Law Perspective in the Application of My Pertamina as a Non-Cash Payment System and Control of Fuel Subsidy Flow. Journal of Transcendental Law, 4(1), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.23917/jtl.v4i1.19976
Aristoteles. (1985). Nicomachean Ethics (Terj. Terence Irwin). Hackett Publishing Company.
Bappenas. (2020). Strategi nasional pengurangan kemiskinan dan penguatan perlindungan sosial. Jakarta: Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional.
Bhat, P. I. (2019). Idea and methods of legal research. Oxford University Press.
Dean, H. (2016). The Idea of the Welfare State. Routledge.
Dwiputrianti, S. (2011). Effectiveness of public sector audit reports in Indonesia (preceding and following audit reform) (pp. 1-381). Australian National University.
Haryanto, J. T. (2016). Study of the Potential Sharing of the Electricity Subsidy by Regional Government. Journal of Social and Development Sciences, 7(3), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.22610/jsds.v7i3.1408
Hirst, E., & Brown, M. (1990). Closing the efficiency gap: barriers to the efficient use of energy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 3(4), 267-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-3449(90)90023-W
Kaufmann, D., & Bellver, A. (2005). Transparenting transparency: Initial empirics and policy applications. Available at SSRN 808664.
Kim, E., & Samudro, Y. N. (2021). Reducing fuel subsidies and financing road infrastructure in Indonesia: a financial computable general equilibrium model. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 57(1), 111-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2019.1643824
Nasional, B. P. P., & Nasional, B. P. P. (2014). Perlindungan sosial di Indonesia: Tantangan dan arah ke depan. Direktorat Perlindungan dan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat. Jakarta.
Rahman, A., Dargusch, P., & Wadley, D. (2021). The political economy of oil supply in Indonesia and the implications for renewable energy development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 144, 111027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111027
Rawls, J. (1971). Atheory of justice. Cambridge (Mass.).
Rousseau, J. J. (1968). The Social. Contract. London: Penguin Books.
Roziqin, A., Mas’ udi, S. Y., & Sihidi, I. T. (2021). An analysis of Indonesian government policies against COVID-19. Public Administration and Policy, 24(1), 92-107. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAP-08-2020-0039
Sen, A. (2014). Development as freedom (1999). The globalization and development reader: Perspectives on development and global change, 525.
Sen, S., & Ganguly, S. (2017). Opportunities, barriers and issues with renewable energy development–A discussion. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 69, 1170-1181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.137
Smeeding, T. M., Saunders, P., Coder, J., Jenkins, S., Fritzell, J., Hagenaars, A. J., ... & Wolfson, M. (1993). Poverty, tnequaltty, and famtly living standards impacts across seven nations: The effect of noncash subsidies for health, education and housing. Review of Income and Wealth, 39(3), 229-256. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1993.tb00458.x
Speer, J. (2012). Participatory governance reform: A good strategy for increasing government responsiveness and improving public services?. World development, 40(12), 2379-2398.
Tanaka, K. (2011). Review of policies and measures for energy efficiency in industry sector. Energy policy, 39(10), 6532-6550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.058
Vogt‐Schilb, A., & Hallegatte, S. (2017). Climate policies and nationally determined contributions: reconciling the needed ambition with the political economy. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, 6(6), e256. https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.256
Widrian, A. F., Arifianto, B. S., & Sasongko, N. A. (2022, June). Review of biodiesel policy in Indonesia. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 1034, No. 1, p. 012062). IOP Publishing. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/link_gateway/2022E&ES.1034a2062W/doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1034/1/012062
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Public Representative and Society Provision

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.