Philosophical Approach in Legal Research

Authors

  • Al Ghozali Hide Wulakada Universitas Slamet Riyadi Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55885/jprsp.v5i3.606

Keywords:

Philosophical Approach, Legal Research, Legal Ontology, Legal Epistemology, Justice

Abstract

This study discusses the philosophical approach in legal research as a fundamental framework that goes beyond the normative and empirical approaches commonly used in legal studies in Indonesia. This paper is motivated by the dominant tendency of the positivistic approach that ignores the philosophical dimension of law, thus making law merely a technocratic and functional instrument. This research is a normative legal research using a philosophical and conceptual approach. The philosophical approach is used to explore the ontological, epistemological, and axiological aspects of law, while the conceptual approach is used to examine key concepts such as the philosophical approach, legal epistemology, and legal rationality. In this study, the philosophical approach is approached through six forms: metaphysical, epistemological, ethical, logical, hermeneutical, and critical. Each approach is explained in a theoretical framework and its application in the context of legal research. The main findings show that the philosophical approach not only enriches theoretical insights, but also opens up reflective space to understand law as an expression of values, morality, and civility of society. Therefore, the integration of philosophical approaches in legal research methodology is very important in order to develop legal science that is not only normative and empirical, but also critical, ethical, and meaningful. This study also recommends the importance of reformulating legal education to be more sensitive to the philosophical and reflective dimensions, in order to produce graduates who are more critical and contributive to social transformation and legal science.

References

Aditya, R. (2021). Diri yang Pra-Deskriptif:(Studi Paralelisme Struktur Fundamental Manusia Dalam Filsafat Heidegger dan Mullā Şadrā). Kanz Philosophia: A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism, 7(1), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.20871/kpjipm.v7i1.97

Batubara, J. (2017). Paradigma penelitian kualitatif dan filsafat ilmu pengetahuan dalam konseling. Jurnal Fokus Konseling, 3(2), 95-107. https://doi.org/10.52657/jfk.v3i2.387

Čehulić, M. (2021). Perspectives of legal culture: A systematic literature review. Revija za sociologiju, 51(2), 257-282.

Dasgupta, S., Mandala, M., Guneri, E. A., Bassim, M., & Tarnutzer, A. A. (2024). The pioneers of vestibular physiology in the 19th century. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 138(11), 1108-1114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215124000951

Fransisco, F., Kristanto, K., Alfarizy, T., & Saputra, F. (2025). Program Pembentukan Keluarga Sadar Hukum (Kadarkum) di Kelurahan Kalampangan Sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat. AKM: Aksi Kepada Masyarakat, 5(2), 837-854. https://doi.org/10.36908/akm.v5i2.1346

Gojali, D. (2022). Filsafat Hukum: Aktualisasi Critical Legal Studies Di Indonesia. Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 4(2), 735-740. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v4i2.3508

Halik, A. (2018). Paradigma kritik penelitian komunikasi (pendekatan kritis-emansipatoris dan metode etnografi kritis). Jurnal Dakwah Tabligh, 19(2), 162-178. https://doi.org/10.24252/jdt.v19i2.7473

Hangel, N., & ChoGlueck, C. (2023). On the pursuitworthiness of qualitative methods in empirical philosophy of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 98, 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.12.009

Karjoko, L., Rosidah, Z. N., & Handayani, I. G. A. K. R. (2019). Refleksi Paradigma Ilmu Pengetahuan Bagi Pembangunan Hukum Pengadaan Tanah. Bestuur, 7(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v7i1.42694

Khuat, N. (2024). Human Existence Through Philosophical Inquiry and Technological Transformation: An Analytical Study. Kalágatos, 21(2), eK24054-eK24054.

Leeuw, F. L., & Schmeet, H. (2016). Empirical legal research: A guidance book for lawyers, legislators and regulators. In Empirical Legal Research. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782549413

Li, M. (2024). Adapting legal education for the changing landscape of regional emerging economies: A dynamic framework for law majors. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(3), 10227-10256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01507-2

Manullang, F. M. (2019). Kritik terhadap struktur ilmu hukum menurut Paul Scholten. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 49(1), 44-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol49.no1.1909

Muhaimin, M. (2020). Metode penelitian hukum. Dalam S. Dr. Muhaimin, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Mataram-NTB: Mataram.

Naeeni, S. K. (2023). The utilitarian approach to environmental law: Balancing costs and benefits. Interdisciplinary Studies in Society, Law, and Politics, 2(1), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.isslp.2.1.2

Nugraha, M. V. A., Putra, I., Salmon, H. C. J., Muhammadong, M., & Lubis, A. F. (2024). Peran Nilai-Nilai Filsafat Hukum dalam Membentuk Landasan Etika Hukum Pada Era Transformasi Digital di Indonesia. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(6), 440-452. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i6.16355

Nugroho, N. (2019). Urgensi Pembaruan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Dalam Dinamika Masyarakat Indonesia. Spektrum Hukum, 14(1), 39-57. https://dx.doi.org/10.35973/sh.v14i1.1102

Prayogi, A. (2021). Paradigma positivisme dan idealisme dalam ilmu sejarah: Tinjauan reflektif terhadap posisi sejarah sebagai ilmu. Tamaddun: Jurnal Kebudayaan Dan Sastra Islam, 21(1), 75-90. https://doi.org/10.19109/tamaddun.v21i1.8732

Probosambodo, Y. A. (2024). Refleksi Kritis atas Perkembangan Ilmu Hukum Internasional di Indonesia dari Sudut Pandang Filsafat Ilmu. Jembatan Hukum: Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara, 1(4), 95-101. https://doi.org/10.62383/jembatan.v1i4.959

Qamar, N., & Rezah, F. S. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum: Doktrinal dan Non-Doktrinal. CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn).

Rahmatullah, I. (2021). Filsafat Hukum Aliran Studi Hukum Kritis (Critical Legal Studies); Konsep dan Aktualisasinya Dalam Hukum Indonesia. Adalah, 5(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.15408/adalah.v5i3.21393

Rubi, R., Maulana, M. C. R., Yulrisnanda, M. F., Saripudin, A., & Syamsudin, S. (2024). Dinamika Hukum Dalam Pengaturan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Ditinjau Dari Sistem Hukum Nasional. Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 5(3), 861-869. https://doi.org/10.55357/is.v5i3.768

Sebok, A. J. (1995). Misunderstanding positivism. Michigan Law Review, 93(7), 2054-2132. https://doi.org/10.2307/1289811

Simanjuntak, E. (2019). Peran yurisprudensi dalam sistem hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 16(1), 83-104. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1615

Tamanaha, B. Z. (2021). Pragmatic Reconstruction in Jurisprudence: Features of a Realistic Legal Theory. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 34(1), 171-202. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2020.19

Vechinski, M. J. (2013). Kathy Acker as Conceptual Artist: In Memoriam to Identity and “Working Past Failure”. Style, 47(4), 525-542. https://doi.org/10.5325/style.47.4.0525

Downloads

Published

2025-07-26

How to Cite

Wulakada, A. G. H. (2025). Philosophical Approach in Legal Research . Journal of Public Representative and Society Provision, 5(3), 545-553. https://doi.org/10.55885/jprsp.v5i3.606