The Effectiveness of Commission Support Staff Communication in Supporting the Implementation of Commission Members' Duties in the Takalar Regency Regional People's Representative Council

Authors

  • Wahyuna Masyaud Master's Program in Communication Science, Graduate School, Universitas Fajar Makassar, Indonesia
  • Andi Vita Sukmarini Universitas Fajar Makassar, Indonesia
  • Fitriana Universitas Fajar Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55885/jprsp.v6i3.887

Keywords:

Communication Effectiveness, Accompanying Staff, Regional People's Representative Council, Internal Communication, Legislative Performance

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to measure the effectiveness of communication between accompanying staff and commission members in the Takalar Regency Regional People's Representative Council (DPRD). This study aims to analyze the role of accompanying staff in assisting commission members in carrying out their duties and functions, such as policy formulation, oversight, and budgeting. This study aims to identify factors that support and hinder the effectiveness of this communication, both for staff and commission members. This study aims to formulate strategic suggestions and recommendations to improve the effectiveness of communication and the performance of accompanying staff in the future. Essentially, this research focuses on the dynamics of internal communication within the regional legislative body and its impact on the smooth functioning of representatives. This study employed qualitative research methods. The results indicate that information delivery is sufficiently accurate, relevant, and timely. The accompanying staff can ensure that commission members receive the data, analysis results, and documents necessary for decision-making. This study also demonstrates the effectiveness of communication because staff can build trust and harmonious working relationships with council members through open and responsive interactions. This good coordination makes it easier for staff to bridge communication between council members, local government, and the community, and ensures that aspirations can be followed up effectively.

References

Altwaijri, S., & Zhang, M. (2023). New patterns of internal communication in public organization: A case study of Saudi Arabia. Public Administration Research, 12(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5539/par.v12n2p1

Ambasa, E., Otele, O. M., & Onyango, G. (2024). Five major themes in legislative committees' research between 2010 and 2023: A review. Politics & Policy, 52(4), 778–800. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12594

Arafat, & Rahayu, T. P. (2024). Communication, technology, and coordination in public sector crisis response. Politeia: Journal of Public Administration and Political Science and International Relations, 2(2), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.61978/politeia.v2i2.964

Arsil, F., Ayuni, Q., & Mauleny, A. T. (2022). The disappearance of the ‘legislative model’: Indonesian parliament's experience in response to Covid-19. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 30(3), 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2022.2067948

Bachmann, T., & Quispe Bravo, K. (2021). Wie entsteht psychologische Sicherheit und Teamidentifikation? Eine empirische Untersuchung. Organisationsberatung, Supervision, Coaching, 28, 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11613-021-00717-4

Baekgaard, M., Döring, M., & Thomsen, M. K. (2025). It's not merely about the content: How rules are communicated matters to administrative burden. Public Administration Review, 85(1), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13751

Beniušis, V. (2023). Internal communication challenges and their solution when hybrid work is implemented in a public sector organization: The case study of the Ministry of Transport and Communications of the Republic of Lithuania. Information & Media, 95, 94–115. https://doi.org/10.15388/Im.2023.95.59

Brandsma, G. J., & Otjes, S. (2024). Gauging the roles of parliamentary staff. Parliamentary Affairs, 77(3), 537–557. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsae001

Campos-Domínguez, E., & Ramos-Vielba, I. (2022). Parliaments and key transformations in digital communication. In B. García-Orosa (Ed.), Digital political communication strategies: Multidisciplinary reflections (pp. 25–41). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81568-4_2

Christiansen, T., Griglio, E., & Lupo, N. (2021). Making representative democracy work: The role of parliamentary administrations in the European Union. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 27(4), 477–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2021.1976948

Davoudi, S., & Johnson, M. (2024). Preconditions of coordination in regional public organizations. Public Management Review, 26(4), 988–1012. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2134915

Eldes, A., Fong, C., & Lowande, K. (2024). Information and confrontation in legislative oversight. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 49(2), 227–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12440

Ferguson, P., Nethery, A., & Nwokora, Z. (2024). Transitional support for former members of parliament: Benchmarks for ‘professional parliaments’. Parliamentary Affairs, 77(3), 489–512. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsad017

Fuller, M., Kamans, E., van Vuuren, M., Wolfensberger, M., & de Jong, M. D. T. (2021). Conceptualizing empathy competence: A professional communication perspective. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 35(3), 333–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/10506519211001125

Halling, A., & Petersen, N. B. G. (2024). Frontline employees' responses to citizens' communication of administrative burdens. Public Administration Review, 84(6), 1017–1037. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13800

Hermanto, B., Subawa, M., Nur, A. I., Aryani, N. M., Dalmau, R. M., & Astariyani, N. L. G. (2025). Legislative planning and quality of legislation: The case of Prolegnas in Indonesia lawmaking. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 301–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2025.2492459

Huang, Q., Wang, Y., & Yuan, K. (2022). How role overload affects physical and psychological health of low-ranking government employees at different ages: The mediating role of burnout. Safety and Health at Work, 13(2), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2022.02.002

Huzaeni, M. R., & Nada, I. Q. (2022). Public participation reconstruction in legislation formation in Indonesia post-pandemic. The Sunan Ampel Review of Political and Social Sciences, 2(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.15642/sarpass.2022.2.1.46-61

Indah, T. R., & Junaidi. (2024). Peranan proses komunikasi pemerintahan: The role of government communication processes. Pencerah Publik, 11(2), 68–72. https://doi.org/10.33084/pencerah.v11i2.11162

Istrate, G.-A., Iacob, C. C., & Hrestic, L. M. (2024). Internal communication in public administration: A mechanism for institutional cohesion and a key driver of organizational performance. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 31(Special), 79–92.

Jacobsen, C. B., & Salomonsen, H. H. (2021). Leadership strategies and internal communication in public organizations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 34(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-03-2020-0086

Julranda, R., Simanjuntak, P. M., & Effendi, S. F. (2022). Quo vadis: The implementation of the public participation principle in the formation of legislation in Indonesia. Padjadjaran Law Review, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.56895/plr.v10i2.1052

Kang, J., & Tak, J. (2021). Development and validity of the communication competence scale of middle managers. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 32(4), 439–471. https://doi.org/10.24230/kjiop.v32i4.439-471

Karabaa, F., Roehrich, J. K., Conway, S., & Turner, J. (2023). Information sharing in public-private relationships: The role of boundary objects in contracts. Public Management Review, 25(11), 2166–2190. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2065344

Keppel, M. (2023). Political control and parliamentary committees of inquiry: Strengthening the quality of democracy. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14, 1298–1320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00883-x

Kornberg, M., & Siefken, S. T. (2023). Committee hearings as parliamentary public engagement: A global perspective. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 29(3), 442–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2023.2249745

Kroeber, C. (2024). Gendered patterns of committee assignments—To what extent are women in parliamentary party groups game changers? Parliamentary Affairs, 77(3), 623–643. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsad011

Lailin, U. R., Haryanti, N., & Ardiansyah, R. S. (2024). Peran administrasi publik dan komunikasi publik dalam membangun kolaborasi antara kelompok masyarakat (Pokmas Mulya Abadi) dan pemerintah guna pembangunan kelurahan. Public Service and Governance Journal, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.56444/psgj.v5i2.1634

Lee, E. Y., Kim, K.-J., Ko, S., & Song, E. K. (2022). Communication competence and resilience are modifiable factors for burnout of operating room nurses in South Korea. BMC Nursing, 21, 203. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00985-0

Leston-Bandeira, C., & Siefken, S. T. (2023). The development of public engagement as a core institutional role for parliaments. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 29(3), 361–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2023.2214390

Maricut-Akbik, A. (2021). Q&A in legislative oversight: A framework for analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 60(3), 539–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12411

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Moleong, L. J. (2016). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Ed. revisi, Cet. 25). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nalle, V. I. W. (2023). Research methodology in legislative drafting in Indonesia. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 11(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2022.2141523

Noviawati, E., Affandi, H., & Suparman, E. (2025). Public participation in lawmaking in the digital age: Insights from Indonesia. The Journal of Legislative Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2025.2564482

Ommundsen, E. C. (2023). The institution's knowledge: Congressional staff experience and committee productivity. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 48(2), 273–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12401

Otjes, S. (2023). What explains the size of parliamentary staff? West European Politics, 46(2), 374–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2049068

Panyasu, K. (2023). A study of internal communication model affecting the staff’s understanding towards the strategic plan of the Faculty of Political Science and Public Administration, Chiang Mai University. Journal of Politics and Governance.

Patra, K. (2024). Parliamentary committees: Meeting the epistemic threshold of legislation. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 70(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/00195561231204893

Reyes-Gonzalez, J. A., Agneessens, F., & Esteve, M. (2024). Shaping influence in governance networks: The role of motivations and information exchange. Public Administration, 102(2), 601–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12942

Reykers, Y. (2021). Strengthening parliamentary oversight of defence procurement: Lessons from Belgium. European Security, 30(4), 505–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2021.1886087

Rukanova, B., van Engelenburg, S., Ubacht, J., Tan, Y.-H., Geurts, M., Sies, M., Molenhuis, M., Slegt, M., & van Dijk, D. (2023). Public value creation through voluntary business to government information sharing enabled by digital infrastructure innovations: A framework for analysis. Government Information Quarterly, 40(2), 101786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101786

Salim, A. M. (2022). Internal communications and organization performance in Zanzibar public institutions. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 22(20), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajeba/2022/v22i2030670

Serra-Silva, S. (2022). How parliaments engage with citizens? Online public engagement: A comparative analysis of parliamentary websites. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 28(4), 489–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2021.1896451

Sholikhah, Z. R., Imron, M., & Mutmainah. (2022). Pengaruh beban kerja, komunikasi, dan lingkungan kerja terhadap kinerja. JAMER: Jurnal Akuntansi Merdeka, 3(1), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.33319/jamer.v3i1.74

Sugiyono. (2005). Metode penelitian administrasi (Ed. 12). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (Cet. 27/28). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suh, J., & Battaglio, P. (2022). Assessing the mediating effect of internal communication on strategic human resource management and perceived performance: An intersectoral comparison. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(3), 464–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X21994185

West, H. F. (2024). Parliamentary committees and ex-post oversight: Institutional options and design. Parliamentary Affairs, 77(3), 601–622. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsad015

Whetsell, T. A., Kroll, A., & DeHart-Davis, L. (2021). Formal hierarchies and informal networks: How organizational structure shapes information search in local government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(4), 653–669. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muab003

Downloads

Published

2026-09-25

How to Cite

Masyaud, W., Sukmarini, A. V. ., & Fitriana, F. (2026). The Effectiveness of Commission Support Staff Communication in Supporting the Implementation of Commission Members’ Duties in the Takalar Regency Regional People’s Representative Council. Journal of Public Representative and Society Provision, 6(3), 793-809. https://doi.org/10.55885/jprsp.v6i3.887